eval-harness
Classification · DBpedia-14

Nineteen-way tie at the top.

Fourteen-way ontology labels on a saturated benchmark: the top is a group of nineteen, and the gold label is sometimes the error.

Question
Label a Wikipedia abstract with one of 14 ontology classes.
Data
280 items from the DBpedia-14 test split
Systems
28 compared: 24 hosted models billed per call; 4 local models and baselines, free
Metric
accuracy — the field's standard; higher is better
Calibration
bert_base_fy 0.9879 vs 0.9903 published
Billed
$1.17 for the whole sweep
01The field

Every system, one axis.

hosted · proprietaryhosted · open weightslocal · freestatistically tied with the leaderhigher score: further right →
⫽qwen_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9929 · rank 1/28 billed $0.0143 for 280 itemsbert_base_fy · local · free accuracy 0.9857 · rank 3/28 free: runs locally, nothing billeddeepseek_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 4/28 billed $0.0209 for 280 itemsgemma_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 5/28 billed $0.0033 for 280 itemsglm_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 6/28 billed $0.0159 for 280 itemsqwen_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9857 · rank 7/28 billed $0.0072 for 280 itemsanthropic_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 · rank 8/28 billed $0.1514 for 280 itemsopenai_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 · rank 9/28 billed $0.2380 for 280 itemsanthropic_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9786 · rank 10/28 billed $0.0536 for 280 itemsllama_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9786 · rank 11/28 billed $0.0084 for 280 itemsdeepseek_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 12/28 billed $0.0079 for 280 itemsgemma_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 13/28 billed $0.0046 for 280 itemsgemma_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 14/28 billed $0.0035 for 280 itemsllama_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 15/28 billed $0.0089 for 280 itemsopenai_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 · rank 16/28 billed $0.0921 for 280 itemsopenai_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 · rank 17/28 billed $0.0360 for 280 itemsglm_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9679 · rank 18/28 billed $0.0359 for 280 itemsqwen_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9679 · rank 19/28 billed $0.0342 for 280 itemsmistral_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9643 · rank 20/28 billed $0.0210 for 280 itemsllama_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 · rank 21/28 billed $0.0076 for 280 itemsmistral_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9571 · rank 22/28 billed $0.0188 for 280 itemsmistral_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 · rank 23/28 billed $0.0039 for 280 itemsdeepseek_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9429 · rank 24/28 billed $0.0028 for 280 itemsglm_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9393 · rank 25/28 billed $0.0052 for 280 itemsbart_mnli · local · free accuracy 0.6286 · rank 27/28 free: runs locally, nothing billed off the scale: far below the fieldanthropic_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9893 · rank 2/28 billed $0.3784 for 280 itemsdearest · 2nd · 0.989qwen_m · 1st · 0.993
⫽qwen_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9929 · rank 1/28 billed $0.0143 for 280 itemsbert_base_fy · local · free accuracy 0.9857 · rank 3/28 free: runs locally, nothing billeddeepseek_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 4/28 billed $0.0209 for 280 itemsgemma_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 5/28 billed $0.0033 for 280 itemsglm_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 · rank 6/28 billed $0.0159 for 280 itemsqwen_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9857 · rank 7/28 billed $0.0072 for 280 itemsanthropic_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 · rank 8/28 billed $0.1514 for 280 itemsopenai_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 · rank 9/28 billed $0.2380 for 280 itemsanthropic_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9786 · rank 10/28 billed $0.0536 for 280 itemsllama_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9786 · rank 11/28 billed $0.0084 for 280 itemsdeepseek_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 12/28 billed $0.0079 for 280 itemsgemma_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 13/28 billed $0.0046 for 280 itemsgemma_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 14/28 billed $0.0035 for 280 itemsllama_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 · rank 15/28 billed $0.0089 for 280 itemsopenai_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 · rank 16/28 billed $0.0921 for 280 itemsopenai_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 · rank 17/28 billed $0.0360 for 280 itemsglm_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9679 · rank 18/28 billed $0.0359 for 280 itemsqwen_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9679 · rank 19/28 billed $0.0342 for 280 itemsmistral_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9643 · rank 20/28 billed $0.0210 for 280 itemsllama_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 · rank 21/28 billed $0.0076 for 280 itemsmistral_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9571 · rank 22/28 billed $0.0188 for 280 itemsmistral_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 · rank 23/28 billed $0.0039 for 280 itemsdeepseek_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9429 · rank 24/28 billed $0.0028 for 280 itemsglm_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9393 · rank 25/28 billed $0.0052 for 280 itemsbart_mnli · local · free accuracy 0.6286 · rank 27/28 free: runs locally, nothing billed off the scale: far below the fieldanthropic_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9893 · rank 2/28 billed $0.3784 for 280 itemsdearest · 2nd · 0.989qwen_m · 1st · 0.993
Each dot is one system, by accuracy. The ringed dot is the most expensive hosted model; the shaded band is the group the leader cannot be statistically separated from. A dot left of the ⫽ break sits far below the rest, off the scale; tap it for its score.
02Cost

What the money bought.

hosted · proprietaryhosted · open weightslocal · freebetter: up · cheaper: left
$0.01$0.1$1$100.9390.9660.993billed cost per 1,000 items (log scale)↑ accuracyfree⫽bert_base_fy · local · free accuracy 0.9857 · $0bart_mnli · local · free accuracy 0.6286 · $0 off the scale: far below the fieldqwen_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9929 $0.0509 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9893 $1.35 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0745 per 1,000 itemsgemma_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0117 per 1,000 itemsglm_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0569 per 1,000 itemsqwen_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9857 $0.0256 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 $0.5409 per 1,000 itemsopenai_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 $0.8501 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9786 $0.1916 per 1,000 itemsllama_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9786 $0.0301 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0280 per 1,000 itemsgemma_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0163 per 1,000 itemsgemma_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0125 per 1,000 itemsllama_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0318 per 1,000 itemsopenai_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 $0.3289 per 1,000 itemsopenai_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 $0.1285 per 1,000 itemsglm_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9679 $0.1281 per 1,000 itemsqwen_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9679 $0.1222 per 1,000 itemsmistral_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9643 $0.0750 per 1,000 itemsllama_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 $0.0273 per 1,000 itemsmistral_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9571 $0.0672 per 1,000 itemsmistral_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 $0.0139 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9429 $0.0101 per 1,000 itemsglm_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9393 $0.0185 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_l · dearestqwen_m · 1st
$0.01$0.1$1$100.9390.9660.993cost per 1,000 items (log)↑ accuracyfree⫽bert_base_fy · local · free accuracy 0.9857 · $0bart_mnli · local · free accuracy 0.6286 · $0 off the scale: far below the fieldqwen_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9929 $0.0509 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9893 $1.35 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0745 per 1,000 itemsgemma_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0117 per 1,000 itemsglm_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9857 $0.0569 per 1,000 itemsqwen_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9857 $0.0256 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 $0.5409 per 1,000 itemsopenai_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9821 $0.8501 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9786 $0.1916 per 1,000 itemsllama_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9786 $0.0301 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_m · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0280 per 1,000 itemsgemma_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0163 per 1,000 itemsgemma_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0125 per 1,000 itemsllama_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9750 $0.0318 per 1,000 itemsopenai_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 $0.3289 per 1,000 itemsopenai_s · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9750 $0.1285 per 1,000 itemsglm_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9679 $0.1281 per 1,000 itemsqwen_l · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9679 $0.1222 per 1,000 itemsmistral_l · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9643 $0.0750 per 1,000 itemsllama_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 $0.0273 per 1,000 itemsmistral_m · hosted · proprietary accuracy 0.9571 $0.0672 per 1,000 itemsmistral_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9571 $0.0139 per 1,000 itemsdeepseek_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9429 $0.0101 per 1,000 itemsglm_s · hosted · open weights accuracy 0.9393 $0.0185 per 1,000 itemsanthropic_l · dearestqwen_m · 1st
Billed cost per 1,000 items, read from the provider's response, against accuracy. Free models sit in the left lane. A dot below the ⫽ break sits far below the rest, off the scale; tap it for its score.
03Findings

What this experiment found.

  1. No winner: a group of nineteen.

    qwen_m leads at 0.9929, statistically tied with 19 others, including the free fine-tune.

  2. The dearest model finished 2nd of 28.

    anthropic_l billed $0.3784 for 280 items. The cheapest model statistically tied with the leader, gemma_m, cost 115× less.

  3. The benchmark is saturated, and the gold is sometimes wrong.

    Three items are disputed by 24 to 25 of 26 arms, and reading them, the gold label is the error.

04The method, here

Tested, not read.

19 arms cannot be separated from the leader. A saturated benchmark sorts; it does not rank — and the table still prints them first, second, third.

This habit, in the method →
05Reproduce it

Check it yourself.

The 4 free arms rerun on a laptop CPU for $0, pinned to the weights that were measured. The 24 hosted arms billed $1.17 when measured and rerun with one OpenRouter key.

make compare writes a replication card: each rerun against its committed run, item by item, and every separation and tie on this page re-tested with your reruns in place.

$ make plan      EXP=dbpedia
$ make data      EXP=dbpedia
$ make reproduce EXP=dbpedia LEVEL=local
# with OPENROUTER_API_KEY set
$ make reproduce EXP=dbpedia LEVEL=hosted
$ make compare   EXP=dbpedia